|
Jeg har fremført og
gentager hermed, at det vil være en menneskelig fejl, at bebrejde min
talsmand med al hans ufuldkommenhed, noget som helst i forbindelse med min
bog, det er mig Eros, der bære det fulde ansvar for hvert eneste ord, ja
for alt i min bog.
Selvom mine kollegaer
tit undsiger sig deres ansvar, ikke mindst de skabende guder, så
fastholder jeg, at helt ned til mindste detalje, hvert et komma er mit
ansvar i min bog.
Hvis nogen skal dømme
min talsmand, er det en opgave for guder og ikke for mennesker, oh
menneske vær tryg ved det. |
|
I have argued and repeats
here, it will be a human error to blame my spokesman with all his imperfections, anything related to my book, that's me Eros, who take full responsibility for every word, yes for everything in my book.
Although my colleagues denounce their responsibility, not least the creative gods, so I maintain that
I to the smallest detail, every comma in my book, is my responsibility.
If anyone should judge my spokesman, it is the job of the gods and not for
humans, oh mankind be comfortable with that. |
|
|
Da jeg tager ordet,
som det fremgår her
på det menneskelige net, fremfører jeg, at det er svært for os guder at
kommunikere i menneskers sprog, vort sprog og vore veje er så meget
højere end menneskenes. Mennesker har det med at tolke deres egen verden
ind i det vi guder ønsker at fortælle, det er menneskeligt, men dermed
tabes budskaber fra guder og der opstår splid blandt mennesker om hvad vi
guder mener. |
|
When I take the word, as shown
here on the human network, I submit that it is difficult for
gods to communicate in human language, our language and our ways are so much higher than
the humans. Men and women tend to interpret their own world into what the gods
are telling, it is human, but thus they lose the messages from the gods and
there occurs discord among mankind about what we gods hold. |
|
|
Jeg har hørt
mennesker sige, at når jeg fremfører, at
seksualitet er for personer, at så giver det menneskene opbakning til fri sex.
Det siger noget om de mennesker.
Da jeg fremførte dette i gudernes råd, var der
flere der klappede sig på lårene og nogle korsede sig.
Da nu stemningen i rådet var høj, var der en, jeg fortæller ikke hvem,
der fremførte at mange af guderne havde udtalt sig om hvad der var
rigtigt at spise for menneskene.
Det at være klar på hvad der er rigtigt at spise, havde ikke givet
anledning til at mennesker var gået ind i købmandsbutikker og hente
sådanne madvare frit. Der gælder jo blandt mennesker love. Således
også for personer, der vil det rette.
Selvom vi guder ofte er uenige om meget, så var der enighed i gudernes
råd om, at vi slet ikke beskæftigede os med, eller gav råd på den
anførte måde -
at det godt nok er menneskeligt at fejlfortolke vor opgave og vore
udtalelser som guder.
En gud spurgte, da der var faldet ro i rådet, om hvordan det kunne være
at mennesker kunne mene andet end at guder var til for at rådgive
mennesker, ikke at pålægge dem begrænsninger. Mennesker måtte jo
uindskrænket have deres handlefrihed, dømt til frihed og ansvar, som
Sartre fremfører. Ingen tog ordet.
|
|
I have heard men and
women saying, that when I argue that sexuality is for persons, then it gives
persons support for free sex. It says something about thise humans.
When I mentioned it in the Council of the Gods, there were several who patted
there thighs and some crossed themselves.
There when the mood of the council was high, there was one, I do not tell whom, who
told that many of the gods had told what was right to eat for mankind.
But being aware of what is right to eat, had not given persones fri right
to go into grocery stores to take such food. There is a matter of human
laws. Thus, to the persons who want, what is right.
Although we gods often disagree on many things, there were an agreement in the Council of the
gods that we have given information in the mentioned way - and that's human to misinterpret our task and our opinions as gods.
A god asked, when there was silence again in the council, how it could be that
man might think otherwise than that the gods were to advise mankind, not to impose restrictions.
Man must unrestricted have their freedom, condemned to freedom and
responsibile, as Sartre argues. No one took word. |
|